Catching a metaphor on the fly: ‘Greenfield genome design’
February 9, 2018
A week ago, something interesting washed up in my twitter stream, something a metaphor collector like me had to pick up and inspect. Andrew Hanson, an expert in metabolic engineering working at the University Florida, tweeted: “Excellent short 2016 piece from @claudiaevickers on #synbio platforms & the future of the microbial cell factory industry. Coins …
Genome editing: Invisible mending
December 1, 2017
Last week I had a few days in Oxford to visit old haunts, such as the Ashmolean, the Museum of Natural History and the Pitt Rivers Museum. I also went to a little exhibition in the basement of the Museum of the History of Science. The exhibition by Anna Dumitriu was entitled BioArt and Bacteria. …
Science and metaphor: Some historical perspectives
October 13, 2017
Over the last thirty years or so I have written about metaphor and its importance to language, thought and social interaction. In the last fifteen years, I have focused in on the relation between metaphor and science, especially science communication. However, only recently has it dawned on me how little I actually understand about metaphor …
Metaphors for many goals: Discussing research in interactional settings
July 28, 2017
This is a guest post by Rony Armon, a Research Assistant at the School of Education, Communication and Society King’s College London, specialising in Communication and Media, Qualitative Social Research, and History of Science. *** In a recent post Brigitte Nerlich reviewed some studies that seemed to suggest that even though metaphors are rampant in scientific discourse …
Do metaphors really matter?
June 16, 2017
I, like many others, from Leibniz to Lakoff, think that metaphors are important for human thinking and acting. They make us see the world in different ways – for good or evil. So, one should keep an eye on them. Recently I have read two articles which seem to imply that metaphors matter less than …
Musings on language and life, with special reference to ‘programming’
April 1, 2016
This morning I opened the newspaper and read an article about a new language that lets researchers design novel biological circuits. I mumbled something about this over coffee and my husband said, oh but wasn’t that old hat, we all knew that DNA was a language, code etc. So what was new? I looked again …
On books, circuits and life
January 7, 2016
I have recently been trying to understand CRISPR, gene editing and genome editing. While reading about these new developments in genomics, I noticed that in the avalanche of news reports reference is only rarely made to synthetic biology (on 5 January there were 188 articles on CRISPR in Major World Newspapers on the LexisNexis news …
On the metaphorical origins of gene drives
December 24, 2015
This morning I woke up to a bit of chat about ‘gene drive‘ – this year’s science breakthrough of the year –, first on twitter, then on the radio. This made me think about the use of terms like gene drive, gene driver, gene driving and where they come from. It also made me think …
Making epigenetics public: A problem with metaphors
May 21, 2015
This article has been co-authored with Aleksandra Stelmach Two years ago, in May 2013, I wrote a blog post about epigenetics. This was at a time when social scientists started to be interested in this new field of genetics/genomics and began to critically scrutinize it. Now, two years later and after a flurry of social …
Paddling in the shallow end of knowledge
October 10, 2014
This post was prompted by two things. I, a social scientist of sorts, recently tried to read two books, Smashing Physics by Jon Butterworth and Synthetic Biology: A Primer by Paul Freemont and Richard Kitney. I also listened in to some conversations where people spoke about how problematic they find it to understand social science …
Subscribe by email
About this blog
This blog promotes discussion of topics related to the research programme 'Making Science Public: Challenges and Opportunities'. Our purpose is not to 'make science public'. Instead, we want to study the opportunities that have emerged for science to be more openly practiced and debated, but also the challenges posed by making science public or by promoting the making public of science as a solution to a variety of problems in society and in politics.
This blog will report on these and other issues related to the Leverhulme funded research programme: Making Science Public: Challenges and Opportunities
Useful links
Recent Posts
MSP bookmarks
- Twitter May 8, 2017
- Social innovations in Europe #RRI November 3, 2015
- Harvey Graff, the undisciplinarian September 20, 2015
- Replacing Pesticides With Genetics August 31, 2015
- Addressing hazardous chemicals in the circular economy August 25, 2015
Categories
- antibiotics
- anticipatory governance
- artifical intelligence
- big data
- biotechnology
- citizen science
- Climate Change
- Climate Politics
- co-production
- coronavirus
- Creationism
- Definition of Science
- designer babies
- disease
- disease
- engineering
- epigenetics
- Food Security
- Food sovereignty
- gene drive
- genomics
- GM Food
- GMOs
- history of science
- Hype
- images and visualisations
- imaginaries
- Immigration
- Impact
- infectious diseases
- innovation
- interdisciplinarity
- Knowledge Society
- Language
- Markets
- Metaphors
- microbiome
- neoliberalism
- Neuroscience
- open access
- Personal Reflection
- Politics
- Public education
- public engagement with science
- public needs
- public participation
- public policy
- public service
- publics
- regulatory science
- Religion
- Republican Party
- research impact
- responsible innovation
- responsive research
- Richard Dawkins
- risk
- Scepticism
- Science
- Science and Government
- science and politics
- Science and Songs
- science communication
- Science Communication
- Science Fiction
- Science Policy
- Social science
- sociology
- space
- space exploration
- synthetic biology
- transparency
- Trust
- Uncategorized
- Uncertainty
- visualisation
- wonder