// Archives
No Break for Nestlé from the Court of Appeal: Refusal of KITKAT shape mark upheld
June 14, 2017
Post by Lynne Chave Lynne is a PhD candidate at the School of Law. Her research investigates the extent to which trade mark and design protection of product shapes overlap. The decision last month from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales is the latest stage in Nestlé’s attempt to gain trademark registration …
Subscribe by email
About this blog
Blog of the research community of the University of Nottingham School of Law.
Useful links
Recent Posts
- On the decision of the Colombian Council of State to prohibit the use of Framework agreements for “minimum amount” public contracts
- ESIL Symposium on Non-UN Sanctions and International Law: Legitimacy, Effectivity and Impact – Nottingham, 10 November 2017
- Criminal Justice Research Centre East Midlands Postgraduate Conference on Criminal Law and Criminology
- How international investment law could improve the enforcement of business and human rights
- No Break for Nestlé from the Court of Appeal: Refusal of KITKAT shape mark upheld
Categories
Tags
Business and human rights
Call for papers
conference
Court of Justice of the European Union
crime
criminal justice
criminal law
criminology
dispute settlement
east midlands
EU Directive 2000/78
European Court of Human Rights
Framework Agreements
Headscarves
Human Rights
Human rights law
Intangible Cultural Heritage
Intellectual Property Rights
International investment law
Investor-state dispute settlement
job opportunities
KitKat Bar
Labour Law
law
nottingham
Peacebuilding
penal reform
Procurement Mehtods
Public Procurement
reform
three-dimensional shapes
Trade Mark
trade mark distinctiveness
Traditional Knowledge
UKIPO
University of Nottingham School of Law
UoN Law Blog
women