Do metaphors really matter?
June 16, 2017
I, like many others, from Leibniz to Lakoff, think that metaphors are important for human thinking and acting. They make us see the world in different ways – for good or evil. So, one should keep an eye on them. Recently I have read two articles which seem to imply that metaphors matter less than …
Gene surgery – Genchirurgie
November 3, 2016
On 22nd October 2016 Roland Jackson tweeted that he was going to Berlin to participate in a trilateral meeting of English (Nuffield Foundation on Bioethics), German and French bioethics committees on gene/genome editing. I tweeted back and asked whether there would be a report; he tweeted an older press release by the German Ethics Council …
Precision metaphors in a messy biological world
February 5, 2016
The promises of nanoscience and nanotechnology have been framed by a variety of future oriented metaphors, such as the those of the fantastic voyage or the master builder. The former metaphor has been especially prominent in early reports on the promises of nanomedicine, but it is still in use today. What happens when real breakthroughs …
On books, circuits and life
January 7, 2016
I have recently been trying to understand CRISPR, gene editing and genome editing. While reading about these new developments in genomics, I noticed that in the avalanche of news reports reference is only rarely made to synthetic biology (on 5 January there were 188 articles on CRISPR in Major World Newspapers on the LexisNexis news …
Gene editing, metaphors and responsible language use
December 11, 2015
Last week I was following the progress of the International Summit on Human Gene Editing, which took place in Washington between 1 and 3 December, 2015. On the last day, I was looking at my twitter timeline and saw that Megan Allyse (a former PhD student) had posted information on a special issue devoted to …
Subscribe by email
About this blog
This blog promotes discussion of topics related to the research programme 'Making Science Public: Challenges and Opportunities'. Our purpose is not to 'make science public'. Instead, we want to study the opportunities that have emerged for science to be more openly practiced and debated, but also the challenges posed by making science public or by promoting the making public of science as a solution to a variety of problems in society and in politics.
This blog will report on these and other issues related to the Leverhulme funded research programme: Making Science Public: Challenges and Opportunities
Useful links
Recent Posts
MSP bookmarks
- Twitter May 8, 2017
- Social innovations in Europe #RRI November 3, 2015
- Harvey Graff, the undisciplinarian September 20, 2015
- Replacing Pesticides With Genetics August 31, 2015
- Addressing hazardous chemicals in the circular economy August 25, 2015
Categories
- antibiotics
- anticipatory governance
- big data
- biotechnology
- citizen science
- Climate Change
- Climate Politics
- co-production
- coronavirus
- Creationism
- Definition of Science
- designer babies
- Embryonic stem cell research
- engineering
- epigenetics
- Food Security
- Food sovereignty
- gene drive
- genomics
- GM Food
- GMOs
- Hype
- images and visualisations
- imaginaries
- Immigration
- Impact
- infectious diseases
- innovation
- interdisciplinarity
- Knowledge Society
- Language
- Markets
- Metaphors
- microbiome
- neoliberalism
- Neuroscience
- open access
- Personal Reflection
- Politics
- Public education
- public engagement with science
- public needs
- public participation
- public policy
- public service
- publics
- regulatory science
- Religion
- Republican Party
- research impact
- responsible innovation
- responsive research
- Richard Dawkins
- risk
- Scepticism
- Science
- Science and Government
- science and politics
- Science and Songs
- Science Communication
- Science Fiction
- Science Policy
- Social science
- sociology
- space
- space exploration
- synthetic biology
- transparency
- Trust
- Uncategorized
- Uncertainty
- visualisation
- wonder